Is Joomla more secure than Ruby on Rails?

Joomla has a security score of 30/100 with 800 total CVEs, while Ruby on Rails scores 62/100 with 180 total CVEs. Ruby on Rails has a stronger security posture. Data from NVD/NIST, July 2026.

How many CVEs does Joomla have compared to Ruby on Rails?

Joomla has 800 total CVEs on record, including 65 critical severity. Ruby on Rails has 180 total CVEs with 18 critical. Joomla has 5 actively exploited (CISA KEV) vs Ruby on Rails's 2.

Should I migrate from Joomla to Ruby on Rails?

Ruby on Rails scores 64/100 overall vs Joomla's 34/100 across 7 dimensions including security, AI-readiness, and cost of ownership. WebPulse recommends migrating away from Joomla.

Which is better for AI-readiness: Joomla or Ruby on Rails?

Joomla scores 25/100 on AI-readiness while Ruby on Rails scores 72/100. Ruby on Rails is better prepared for AI agent interaction. AI-readiness measures structured data support, API availability, and machine-readable output.

← All framework rankings

Joomla vs Ruby on Rails

Security & risk comparison · Updated June 2026

How does Joomla compare to Ruby on Rails on security, AI-readiness, and total cost of ownership? We scored both across 7 dimensions using NVD/NIST CVE data, GitHub metrics, and our scan of 10M+ sites.

Key finding

Ruby on Rails scores 64/100 overall versus Joomla's 34/100. Ruby on Rails has 180 total CVEs compared to Joomla's 800, giving it a smaller vulnerability surface. (Source: WebPulse framework scoring, NVD/NIST, July 2026)

Dimension-by-dimension breakdown

security Ruby on Rails

Joomla

Ruby on Rails

performance Tie

Joomla

Ruby on Rails

ecosystem Ruby on Rails

Joomla

Ruby on Rails

ai readiness Ruby on Rails

Joomla

Ruby on Rails

developer experience Ruby on Rails

Joomla

Ruby on Rails

market trajectory Ruby on Rails

Joomla

Ruby on Rails

cost of ownership Ruby on Rails

Joomla

Ruby on Rails

Security details

Metric	Joomla	Ruby on Rails
Total CVEs	800	180
Critical CVEs	65	18
Exploited (KEV)	5	2
CVEs last year	80	15
Avg CVSS	6.8	5.8
Security score	30/100	62/100

Migrate Away

Joomla

Joomla scores 34/100. Consider migrating to: nextjs, astro, hugo.

Alternatives: nextjs, astro, hugo

Acceptable

Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails scores 65/100. Verdict: Acceptable.

Quick facts

Joomla

Category: Cms

Language: PHP

First release: 2005

Generation: Legacy

Trend: Declining

Market share: 1.2%

Ruby on Rails

Category: Backend

Language: RUBY

First release: 2004

Generation: Modern

Trend: Stable

Market share: 0.8%

Related briefings

Joomla Page Builder Flaw Lands on CISA's Actively Exploited Vulnerability List

July 8, 2026

WordPress Ships Zero GitHub Releases. Every Other Framework Ships 40–50.

June 23, 2026

Joomla Ships 644 Commits Per Year. It Still Carries 1,313 CVEs.

June 23, 2026

SingGuard-NSFA: Open-Source Guardrails for Agentic AI Risk

July 15, 2026

Django: Zero New CVEs. Rails: 12. Same Era, Different Security Outcomes.

June 23, 2026

Universities Built for Browsers Are Invisible to AI. That Affects Enrollment.

June 10, 2026

More comparisons

Joomla vs WordPress Joomla vs Next.js Joomla vs Drupal Joomla vs React Joomla vs Angular Joomla vs Django Joomla vs Laravel Joomla vs Vue.js Joomla vs Astro Joomla vs Hugo Joomla vs SvelteKit Ruby on Rails vs WordPress Ruby on Rails vs Next.js Ruby on Rails vs Drupal Ruby on Rails vs React Ruby on Rails vs Angular Ruby on Rails vs Django Ruby on Rails vs Laravel Ruby on Rails vs Vue.js Ruby on Rails vs Astro Ruby on Rails vs Hugo Ruby on Rails vs SvelteKit

Data sourced from NVD/NIST CVE database, GitHub API, and WebPulse framework scanner. Scores calculated using a 7-dimension model covering security, performance, ecosystem health, AI-readiness, developer experience, market trajectory, and cost of ownership. Updated June 2026.