Skip to content
← All framework rankings

React vs Ruby on Rails

Security & risk comparison · Updated October 2026

How does React compare to Ruby on Rails on security, AI-readiness, and total cost of ownership? We scored both across 7 dimensions using NVD/NIST CVE data, GitHub metrics, and our census of the Tranco top 100,000.

Key finding

React scores 71/100 overall versus Ruby on Rails's 64/100. React has 20 total CVEs compared to Ruby on Rails's 180, giving it a smaller vulnerability surface. (Source: WebPulse framework scoring, NIST NVD and CISA KEV, updated October 2026)

Who actually runs React and Ruby on Rails

Share of sites with an identified platform, from WebPulse's scan of the Tranco top 100,000 and our Common Crawl census.

WhereReactRuby on Rails
Top 1,000 5.1% (11) 3.3% (7)
Top 10,000 3.2% (81) 3.3% (85)
Top 100,000 2.1% (573) 3.0% (832)
Wider web0.8%0.9%

Highest-ranked sites on React

  1. github.com#29
  2. ok.ru#314
  3. alibaba.com#316
  4. nike.com#637
  5. 2gis.com#640

Highest-ranked sites on Ruby on Rails

  1. www.gov.uk#308
  2. duolingo.com#457
  3. goodreads.com#463
  4. openstreetmap.org#579
  5. service.gov.uk#666

Detected from each homepage's HTML, headers and cookies in September 2026. Methodology

71
React
Modern · JAVASCRIPT
vs
64
Ruby on Rails
Modern · RUBY
Dimension-by-dimension breakdown
security React
80
62
React
Ruby on Rails
performance Tie
65
65
React
Ruby on Rails
ecosystem React
82
70
React
Ruby on Rails
ai readiness Ruby on Rails
55
72
React
Ruby on Rails
developer experience Tie
70
70
React
Ruby on Rails
market trajectory React
90
50
React
Ruby on Rails
cost of ownership Ruby on Rails
55
60
React
Ruby on Rails
Security details
Metric React Ruby on Rails
Total CVEs 20 180
Critical CVEs 2 18
Exploited (KEV) 0 2
CVEs last year 3 15
Avg CVSS 4.5 5.8
Security score 80/100 62/100
Acceptable
React

React scores 72/100. Verdict: Acceptable.

Acceptable
Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails scores 65/100. Verdict: Acceptable.

Quick facts
React
Category: Frontend
Language: JAVASCRIPT
First release: 2013
Generation: Modern
Trend: Rising
Market share: 8.0%
Ruby on Rails
Category: Backend
Language: RUBY
First release: 2004
Generation: Modern
Trend: Stable
Market share: 0.8%
Related briefings
Goodfire interpretability essay: neurons may be readable
October 16, 2026
TinaCMS tina-markdown stored XSS (GHSA-c42q-qvc3-j6vg)
October 10, 2026
React CVE-2026-23870: one request can stall servers
October 9, 2026
Agent products show users less of the harness
October 20, 2026
Smarter AI Models Still Need Permissions and Spend Limits
October 20, 2026
Layered evals: why one check never makes an AI agent safe
October 18, 2026
More comparisons
React vs WordPress React vs Next.js React vs Drupal React vs Angular React vs Django React vs Laravel React vs Vue.js React vs Astro React vs Hugo React vs SvelteKit Ruby on Rails vs WordPress Ruby on Rails vs Next.js Ruby on Rails vs Drupal Ruby on Rails vs Angular Ruby on Rails vs Django Ruby on Rails vs Laravel Ruby on Rails vs Vue.js Ruby on Rails vs Astro Ruby on Rails vs Hugo Ruby on Rails vs SvelteKit

Data sourced from NVD/NIST CVE database, GitHub API, and WebPulse framework scanner. Scores calculated using a 7-dimension model covering security, performance, ecosystem health, AI-readiness, developer experience, market trajectory, and cost of ownership. Updated October 2026.