Is Ruby on Rails more secure than Laravel?

Ruby on Rails has a security score of 62/100 with 180 total CVEs, while Laravel scores 72/100 with 50 total CVEs. Laravel has a stronger security posture. Data from NVD/NIST, July 2026.

How many CVEs does Ruby on Rails have compared to Laravel?

Ruby on Rails has 180 total CVEs on record, including 18 critical severity. Laravel has 50 total CVEs with 5 critical. Ruby on Rails has 2 actively exploited (CISA KEV) vs Laravel's 0.

Should I migrate from Ruby on Rails to Laravel?

Laravel scores 70/100 overall vs Ruby on Rails's 64/100 across 7 dimensions including security, AI-readiness, and cost of ownership. Both frameworks are viable choices; compare dimensions relevant to your use case.

Which is better for AI-readiness: Ruby on Rails or Laravel?

Ruby on Rails scores 72/100 on AI-readiness while Laravel scores 74/100. Laravel is better prepared for AI agent interaction. AI-readiness measures structured data support, API availability, and machine-readable output.

← All framework rankings

Ruby on Rails vs Laravel

Security & risk comparison · Updated June 2026

How does Ruby on Rails compare to Laravel on security, AI-readiness, and total cost of ownership? We scored both across 7 dimensions using NVD/NIST CVE data, GitHub metrics, and our scan of 10M+ sites.

Key finding

Laravel scores 70/100 overall versus Ruby on Rails's 64/100. Laravel has 50 total CVEs compared to Ruby on Rails's 180, giving it a smaller vulnerability surface. (Source: WebPulse framework scoring, NVD/NIST, July 2026)

Dimension-by-dimension breakdown

security Laravel

Ruby on Rails

Laravel

performance Tie

Ruby on Rails

Laravel

ecosystem Laravel

Ruby on Rails

Laravel

ai readiness Laravel

Ruby on Rails

Laravel

developer experience Laravel

Ruby on Rails

Laravel

market trajectory Laravel

Ruby on Rails

Laravel

cost of ownership Tie

Ruby on Rails

Laravel

Security details

Metric	Ruby on Rails	Laravel
Total CVEs	180	50
Critical CVEs	18	5
Exploited (KEV)	2	0
CVEs last year	15	10
Avg CVSS	5.8	5.0
Security score	62/100	72/100

Acceptable

Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails scores 65/100. Verdict: Acceptable.

Acceptable

Laravel

Laravel scores 71/100. Verdict: Acceptable.

Quick facts

Ruby on Rails

Category: Backend

Language: RUBY

First release: 2004

Generation: Modern

Trend: Stable

Market share: 0.8%

Laravel

Category: Backend

Language: PHP

First release: 2011

Generation: Modern

Trend: Rising

Market share: 1.8%

Related briefings

SingGuard-NSFA: Open-Source Guardrails for Agentic AI Risk

July 15, 2026

Django: Zero New CVEs. Rails: 12. Same Era, Different Security Outcomes.

June 23, 2026

Universities Built for Browsers Are Invisible to AI. That Affects Enrollment.

June 10, 2026

8 Frameworks Shipped Updates in One Week — Why It Matters

July 2, 2026

Framework-Native CMS on Laravel: What the CVE Ledger Shows

June 30, 2026

Laravel Monolith Scale: When Codebases Require Automated Boundary Discovery

June 29, 2026

More comparisons

Ruby on Rails vs WordPress Ruby on Rails vs Next.js Ruby on Rails vs Drupal Ruby on Rails vs React Ruby on Rails vs Angular Ruby on Rails vs Django Ruby on Rails vs Vue.js Ruby on Rails vs Astro Ruby on Rails vs Hugo Ruby on Rails vs SvelteKit Laravel vs WordPress Laravel vs Next.js Laravel vs Drupal Laravel vs React Laravel vs Angular Laravel vs Django Laravel vs Vue.js Laravel vs Astro Laravel vs Hugo Laravel vs SvelteKit

Data sourced from NVD/NIST CVE database, GitHub API, and WebPulse framework scanner. Scores calculated using a 7-dimension model covering security, performance, ecosystem health, AI-readiness, developer experience, market trajectory, and cost of ownership. Updated June 2026.