Is Ruby on Rails more secure than Hugo?

Ruby on Rails has a security score of 62/100 with 180 total CVEs, while Hugo scores 92/100 with 5 total CVEs. Hugo has a stronger security posture. Data from NVD/NIST, July 2026.

How many CVEs does Ruby on Rails have compared to Hugo?

Ruby on Rails has 180 total CVEs on record, including 18 critical severity. Hugo has 5 total CVEs with 0 critical. Ruby on Rails has 2 actively exploited (CISA KEV) vs Hugo's 0.

Should I migrate from Ruby on Rails to Hugo?

Hugo scores 75/100 overall vs Ruby on Rails's 64/100 across 7 dimensions including security, AI-readiness, and cost of ownership. Both frameworks are viable choices; compare dimensions relevant to your use case.

Which is better for AI-readiness: Ruby on Rails or Hugo?

Ruby on Rails scores 72/100 on AI-readiness while Hugo scores 88/100. Hugo is better prepared for AI agent interaction. AI-readiness measures structured data support, API availability, and machine-readable output.

← All framework rankings

Ruby on Rails vs Hugo

Security & risk comparison · Updated June 2026

How does Ruby on Rails compare to Hugo on security, AI-readiness, and total cost of ownership? We scored both across 7 dimensions using NVD/NIST CVE data, GitHub metrics, and our scan of 10M+ sites.

Key finding

Hugo scores 75/100 overall versus Ruby on Rails's 64/100. Hugo has 5 total CVEs compared to Ruby on Rails's 180, giving it a smaller vulnerability surface. (Source: WebPulse framework scoring, NVD/NIST, July 2026)

Dimension-by-dimension breakdown

security Hugo

Ruby on Rails

Hugo

performance Tie

Ruby on Rails

Hugo

ecosystem Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails

Hugo

ai readiness Hugo

Ruby on Rails

Hugo

developer experience Tie

Ruby on Rails

Hugo

market trajectory Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails

Hugo

cost of ownership Hugo

Ruby on Rails

Hugo

Security details

Metric	Ruby on Rails	Hugo
Total CVEs	180	5
Critical CVEs	18	0
Exploited (KEV)	2	0
CVEs last year	15	1
Avg CVSS	5.8	3.0
Security score	62/100	92/100

Acceptable

Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails scores 65/100. Verdict: Acceptable.

Recommended

Hugo

Hugo scores 75/100. Verdict: Recommended.

Quick facts

Ruby on Rails

Category: Backend

Language: RUBY

First release: 2004

Generation: Modern

Trend: Stable

Market share: 0.8%

Hugo

Category: Ssg

Language: GO

First release: 2013

Generation: Modern

Trend: Rising

Market share: 0.1%

Related briefings

SingGuard-NSFA: Open-Source Guardrails for Agentic AI Risk

July 15, 2026

Django: Zero New CVEs. Rails: 12. Same Era, Different Security Outcomes.

June 23, 2026

Universities Built for Browsers Are Invisible to AI. That Affects Enrollment.

June 10, 2026

Zero-CVE Frameworks Gain Share: Hugo, Astro, HTMX

July 3, 2026

CVE-2026-44574: Next.js Middleware Auth Bypass via Query Parameter

June 15, 2026

Static Sites: The Only Framework Category Not Getting Owned in 2026

June 7, 2026

More comparisons

Ruby on Rails vs WordPress Ruby on Rails vs Next.js Ruby on Rails vs Drupal Ruby on Rails vs React Ruby on Rails vs Angular Ruby on Rails vs Django Ruby on Rails vs Laravel Ruby on Rails vs Vue.js Ruby on Rails vs Astro Ruby on Rails vs SvelteKit Hugo vs WordPress Hugo vs Next.js Hugo vs Drupal Hugo vs React Hugo vs Angular Hugo vs Django Hugo vs Laravel Hugo vs Vue.js Hugo vs Astro Hugo vs SvelteKit

Data sourced from NVD/NIST CVE database, GitHub API, and WebPulse framework scanner. Scores calculated using a 7-dimension model covering security, performance, ecosystem health, AI-readiness, developer experience, market trajectory, and cost of ownership. Updated June 2026.