Is Gatsby more secure than Ruby on Rails?

Gatsby has a security score of 78/100 with 15 total CVEs, while Ruby on Rails scores 62/100 with 180 total CVEs. Gatsby has a stronger security posture. Data from NVD/NIST, July 2026.

How many CVEs does Gatsby have compared to Ruby on Rails?

Gatsby has 15 total CVEs on record, including 1 critical severity. Ruby on Rails has 180 total CVEs with 18 critical. Gatsby has 0 actively exploited (CISA KEV) vs Ruby on Rails's 2.

Should I migrate from Gatsby to Ruby on Rails?

Ruby on Rails scores 64/100 overall vs Gatsby's 60/100 across 7 dimensions including security, AI-readiness, and cost of ownership. Both frameworks are viable choices; compare dimensions relevant to your use case.

Which is better for AI-readiness: Gatsby or Ruby on Rails?

Gatsby scores 60/100 on AI-readiness while Ruby on Rails scores 72/100. Ruby on Rails is better prepared for AI agent interaction. AI-readiness measures structured data support, API availability, and machine-readable output.

← All framework rankings

Gatsby vs Ruby on Rails

Security & risk comparison · Updated June 2026

How does Gatsby compare to Ruby on Rails on security, AI-readiness, and total cost of ownership? We scored both across 7 dimensions using NVD/NIST CVE data, GitHub metrics, and our scan of 10M+ sites.

Key finding

Ruby on Rails scores 64/100 overall versus Gatsby's 60/100. Ruby on Rails has 180 total CVEs compared to Gatsby's 15, though its larger ecosystem contributes to a higher CVE count. (Source: WebPulse framework scoring, NVD/NIST, July 2026)

Dimension-by-dimension breakdown

security Gatsby

Gatsby

Ruby on Rails

performance Tie

Gatsby

Ruby on Rails

ecosystem Ruby on Rails

Gatsby

Ruby on Rails

ai readiness Ruby on Rails

Gatsby

Ruby on Rails

developer experience Tie

Gatsby

Ruby on Rails

market trajectory Ruby on Rails

Gatsby

Ruby on Rails

cost of ownership Gatsby

Gatsby

Ruby on Rails

Security details

Metric	Gatsby	Ruby on Rails
Total CVEs	15	180
Critical CVEs	1	18
Exploited (KEV)	0	2
CVEs last year	4	15
Avg CVSS	4.2	5.8
Security score	78/100	62/100

Acceptable

Gatsby

Gatsby scores 60/100. Verdict: Acceptable.

Acceptable

Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails scores 65/100. Verdict: Acceptable.

Quick facts

Gatsby

Category: Ssg

Language: JAVASCRIPT

First release: 2015

Generation: Modern

Trend: Stable

Market share: 0.3%

Ruby on Rails

Category: Backend

Language: RUBY

First release: 2004

Generation: Modern

Trend: Stable

Market share: 0.8%

Related briefings

Gatsby: 55K Stars, 183 Commits. Developer Love Dies Quietly.

June 21, 2026

HTMX Surpassed Gatsby and SvelteKit. 11,482 Sites at 10M.

June 2026

Joomla: 352,042 Detections. More Than Astro, SvelteKit, Remix, and Gatsby Combined.

June 2026

SingGuard-NSFA: Open-Source Guardrails for Agentic AI Risk

July 15, 2026

Django: Zero New CVEs. Rails: 12. Same Era, Different Security Outcomes.

June 23, 2026

Universities Built for Browsers Are Invisible to AI. That Affects Enrollment.

June 10, 2026

More comparisons

Gatsby vs WordPress Gatsby vs Next.js Gatsby vs Drupal Gatsby vs React Gatsby vs Angular Gatsby vs Django Gatsby vs Laravel Gatsby vs Vue.js Gatsby vs Astro Gatsby vs Hugo Gatsby vs SvelteKit Ruby on Rails vs WordPress Ruby on Rails vs Next.js Ruby on Rails vs Drupal Ruby on Rails vs React Ruby on Rails vs Angular Ruby on Rails vs Django Ruby on Rails vs Laravel Ruby on Rails vs Vue.js Ruby on Rails vs Astro Ruby on Rails vs Hugo Ruby on Rails vs SvelteKit

Data sourced from NVD/NIST CVE database, GitHub API, and WebPulse framework scanner. Scores calculated using a 7-dimension model covering security, performance, ecosystem health, AI-readiness, developer experience, market trajectory, and cost of ownership. Updated June 2026.