Django vs Gatsby
Security & risk comparison · Updated October 2026
How does Django compare to Gatsby on security, AI-readiness, and total cost of ownership? We scored both across 7 dimensions using NVD/NIST CVE data, GitHub metrics, and our census of the Tranco top 100,000.
Django scores 67/100 overall versus Gatsby's 60/100. Django has 120 total CVEs compared to Gatsby's 15, though its larger ecosystem contributes to a higher CVE count. (Source: WebPulse framework scoring, NIST NVD and CISA KEV, updated October 2026)
Who actually runs Django and Gatsby
Share of sites with an identified platform, from WebPulse's scan of the Tranco top 100,000 and our Common Crawl census.
| Where | Django | Gatsby |
|---|---|---|
| Top 1,000 | 0.0% (0) | 0.5% (1) |
| Top 10,000 | 0.5% (14) | 1.5% (39) |
| Top 100,000 | 0.6% (165) | 0.9% (256) |
| Wider web | 0.4% | 0.1% |
Highest-ranked sites on Django
- parallels.com#2,648
- namasha.com#3,080
- kdocs.cn#3,357
- cwi.nl#4,261
- nic.cz#5,988
Highest-ranked sites on Gatsby
- b-cdn.net#108
- utorrent.com#1,445
- home.pl#1,783
- pusher.com#1,853
- wa.link#1,950
Detected from each homepage's HTML, headers and cookies in September 2026. Methodology
| Metric | Django | Gatsby |
|---|---|---|
| Total CVEs | 120 | 15 |
| Critical CVEs | 12 | 1 |
| Exploited (KEV) | 1 | 0 |
| CVEs last year | 12 | 4 |
| Avg CVSS | 5.5 | 4.2 |
| Security score | 68/100 | 78/100 |
Django scores 68/100. Verdict: Acceptable.
Gatsby scores 60/100. Verdict: Acceptable.
Data sourced from NVD/NIST CVE database, GitHub API, and WebPulse framework scanner. Scores calculated using a 7-dimension model covering security, performance, ecosystem health, AI-readiness, developer experience, market trajectory, and cost of ownership. Updated October 2026.