Is Ruby on Rails more secure than Hono?

Ruby on Rails has a security score of 62/100 with 180 total CVEs, while Hono scores 50/100 with 0 total CVEs. Ruby on Rails has a stronger security posture. Data from NVD/NIST, July 2026.

How many CVEs does Ruby on Rails have compared to Hono?

Ruby on Rails has 180 total CVEs on record, including 18 critical severity. Hono has 0 total CVEs with 0 critical. Ruby on Rails has 2 actively exploited (CISA KEV) vs Hono's 0.

Should I migrate from Hono to Ruby on Rails?

Ruby on Rails scores 64/100 overall vs Hono's 51/100 across 7 dimensions including security, AI-readiness, and cost of ownership. Hono is rated 'caution' — evaluate based on your specific requirements.

Which is better for AI-readiness: Ruby on Rails or Hono?

Ruby on Rails scores 72/100 on AI-readiness while Hono scores 40/100. Ruby on Rails is better prepared for AI agent interaction. AI-readiness measures structured data support, API availability, and machine-readable output.

← All framework rankings

Ruby on Rails vs Hono

Security & risk comparison · Updated June 2026

How does Ruby on Rails compare to Hono on security, AI-readiness, and total cost of ownership? We scored both across 7 dimensions using NVD/NIST CVE data, GitHub metrics, and our scan of 10M+ sites.

Key finding

Ruby on Rails scores 64/100 overall versus Hono's 51/100. Ruby on Rails has 180 total CVEs compared to Hono's 0, though its larger ecosystem contributes to a higher CVE count. (Source: WebPulse framework scoring, NVD/NIST, July 2026)

Ruby on Rails

Modern · RUBY

Hono

Emerging · JAVASCRIPT

Dimension-by-dimension breakdown

security Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails

Hono

performance Tie

Ruby on Rails

Hono

ecosystem Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails

Hono

ai readiness Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails

Hono

developer experience Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails

Hono

market trajectory Tie

Ruby on Rails

Hono

cost of ownership Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails

Hono

Security details

Metric	Ruby on Rails	Hono
Total CVEs	180	0
Critical CVEs	18	0
Exploited (KEV)	2	0
CVEs last year	15	0
Avg CVSS	5.8	0
Security score	62/100	50/100

Acceptable

Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails scores 65/100. Verdict: Acceptable.

Caution

Hono

Hono scores 51/100. Evaluate modern alternatives for better security and AI-readiness.

Quick facts

Ruby on Rails

Category: Backend

Language: RUBY

First release: 2004

Generation: Modern

Trend: Stable

Market share: 0.8%

Hono

Category: Backend

Language: JAVASCRIPT

First release: 2022

Generation: Emerging

Trend: Stable

Related briefings

SingGuard-NSFA: Open-Source Guardrails for Agentic AI Risk

July 15, 2026

Django: Zero New CVEs. Rails: 12. Same Era, Different Security Outcomes.

June 23, 2026

Universities Built for Browsers Are Invisible to AI. That Affects Enrollment.

June 10, 2026

More comparisons

Ruby on Rails vs WordPress Ruby on Rails vs Next.js Ruby on Rails vs Drupal Ruby on Rails vs React Ruby on Rails vs Angular Ruby on Rails vs Django Ruby on Rails vs Laravel Ruby on Rails vs Vue.js Ruby on Rails vs Astro Ruby on Rails vs Hugo Ruby on Rails vs SvelteKit Hono vs WordPress Hono vs Next.js Hono vs Drupal Hono vs React Hono vs Angular Hono vs Django Hono vs Laravel Hono vs Vue.js Hono vs Astro Hono vs Hugo Hono vs SvelteKit

Data sourced from NVD/NIST CVE database, GitHub API, and WebPulse framework scanner. Scores calculated using a 7-dimension model covering security, performance, ecosystem health, AI-readiness, developer experience, market trajectory, and cost of ownership. Updated June 2026.