Is Hugo more secure than Ruby on Rails?

Hugo has a security score of 92/100 with 5 total CVEs, while Ruby on Rails scores 62/100 with 180 total CVEs. Hugo has a stronger security posture. Data from NVD/NIST, July 2026.

How many CVEs does Hugo have compared to Ruby on Rails?

Hugo has 5 total CVEs on record, including 0 critical severity. Ruby on Rails has 180 total CVEs with 18 critical. Hugo has 0 actively exploited (CISA KEV) vs Ruby on Rails's 2.

Should I migrate from Ruby on Rails to Hugo?

Hugo scores 75/100 overall vs Ruby on Rails's 64/100 across 7 dimensions including security, AI-readiness, and cost of ownership. Both frameworks are viable choices; compare dimensions relevant to your use case.

Which is better for AI-readiness: Hugo or Ruby on Rails?

Hugo scores 88/100 on AI-readiness while Ruby on Rails scores 72/100. Hugo is better prepared for AI agent interaction. AI-readiness measures structured data support, API availability, and machine-readable output.

← All framework rankings

Hugo vs Ruby on Rails

Security & risk comparison · Updated June 2026

How does Hugo compare to Ruby on Rails on security, AI-readiness, and total cost of ownership? We scored both across 7 dimensions using NVD/NIST CVE data, GitHub metrics, and our scan of 10M+ sites.

Key finding

Hugo scores 75/100 overall versus Ruby on Rails's 64/100. Hugo has 5 total CVEs compared to Ruby on Rails's 180, giving it a smaller vulnerability surface. (Source: WebPulse framework scoring, NVD/NIST, July 2026)

Dimension-by-dimension breakdown

security Hugo

Hugo

Ruby on Rails

performance Tie

Hugo

Ruby on Rails

ecosystem Ruby on Rails

Hugo

Ruby on Rails

ai readiness Hugo

Hugo

Ruby on Rails

developer experience Tie

Hugo

Ruby on Rails

market trajectory Ruby on Rails

Hugo

Ruby on Rails

cost of ownership Hugo

Hugo

Ruby on Rails

Security details

Metric	Hugo	Ruby on Rails
Total CVEs	5	180
Critical CVEs	0	18
Exploited (KEV)	0	2
CVEs last year	1	15
Avg CVSS	3.0	5.8
Security score	92/100	62/100

Recommended

Hugo

Hugo scores 75/100. Verdict: Recommended.

Acceptable

Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails scores 65/100. Verdict: Acceptable.

Quick facts

Hugo

Category: Ssg

Language: GO

First release: 2013

Generation: Modern

Trend: Rising

Market share: 0.1%

Ruby on Rails

Category: Backend

Language: RUBY

First release: 2004

Generation: Modern

Trend: Stable

Market share: 0.8%

Related briefings

Zero-CVE Frameworks Gain Share: Hugo, Astro, HTMX

July 3, 2026

CVE-2026-44574: Next.js Middleware Auth Bypass via Query Parameter

June 15, 2026

Static Sites: The Only Framework Category Not Getting Owned in 2026

June 7, 2026

SingGuard-NSFA: Open-Source Guardrails for Agentic AI Risk

July 15, 2026

Django: Zero New CVEs. Rails: 12. Same Era, Different Security Outcomes.

June 23, 2026

Universities Built for Browsers Are Invisible to AI. That Affects Enrollment.

June 10, 2026

More comparisons

Hugo vs WordPress Hugo vs Next.js Hugo vs Drupal Hugo vs React Hugo vs Angular Hugo vs Django Hugo vs Laravel Hugo vs Vue.js Hugo vs Astro Hugo vs SvelteKit Ruby on Rails vs WordPress Ruby on Rails vs Next.js Ruby on Rails vs Drupal Ruby on Rails vs React Ruby on Rails vs Angular Ruby on Rails vs Django Ruby on Rails vs Laravel Ruby on Rails vs Vue.js Ruby on Rails vs Astro Ruby on Rails vs SvelteKit

Data sourced from NVD/NIST CVE database, GitHub API, and WebPulse framework scanner. Scores calculated using a 7-dimension model covering security, performance, ecosystem health, AI-readiness, developer experience, market trajectory, and cost of ownership. Updated June 2026.