Django vs WordPress
Security & risk comparison · Updated October 2026
How does Django compare to WordPress on security, AI-readiness, and total cost of ownership? We scored both across 7 dimensions using NVD/NIST CVE data, GitHub metrics, and our census of the Tranco top 100,000.
Django scores 67/100 overall versus WordPress's 44/100. Django has 120 total CVEs compared to WordPress's 11334, giving it a smaller vulnerability surface. (Source: WebPulse framework scoring, NIST NVD and CISA KEV, updated October 2026)
Who actually runs Django and WordPress
Share of sites with an identified platform, from WebPulse's scan of the Tranco top 100,000 and our Common Crawl census.
| Where | Django | WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| Top 1,000 | 0.0% (0) | 23.3% (50) |
| Top 10,000 | 0.5% (14) | 29.0% (743) |
| Top 100,000 | 0.6% (165) | 37.4% (10,368) |
| Wider web | 0.4% | 74.3% |
Highest-ranked sites on Django
- parallels.com#2,648
- namasha.com#3,080
- kdocs.cn#3,357
- cwi.nl#4,261
- nic.cz#5,988
Highest-ranked sites on WordPress
- wordpress.org#48
- wordpress.com#100
- bit.ly#117
- criteo.com#132
- gravatar.com#154
Detected from each homepage's HTML, headers and cookies in September 2026. Methodology
| Metric | Django | WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| Total CVEs | 120 | 11334 |
| Critical CVEs | 12 | 387 |
| Exploited (KEV) | 1 | 23 |
| CVEs last year | 12 | 4200 |
| Avg CVSS | 5.5 | 6.1 |
| Security score | 68/100 | 22/100 |
Django scores 68/100. Verdict: Acceptable.
Data sourced from NVD/NIST CVE database, GitHub API, and WebPulse framework scanner. Scores calculated using a 7-dimension model covering security, performance, ecosystem health, AI-readiness, developer experience, market trajectory, and cost of ownership. Updated October 2026.