Flask vs Hono
Security & risk comparison · Updated June 2026
How does Flask compare to Hono on security, AI-readiness, and total cost of ownership? We scored both across 7 dimensions using NVD/NIST CVE data, GitHub metrics, and our scan of 10M+ sites.
Flask scores 63/100 overall versus Hono's 51/100. Flask has 30 total CVEs compared to Hono's 0, though its larger ecosystem contributes to a higher CVE count. (Source: WebPulse framework scoring, NVD/NIST, July 2026)
| Metric | Flask | Hono |
|---|---|---|
| Total CVEs | 30 | 0 |
| Critical CVEs | 3 | 0 |
| Exploited (KEV) | 0 | 0 |
| CVEs last year | 5 | 0 |
| Avg CVSS | 4.8 | 0 |
| Security score | 75/100 | 50/100 |
Flask scores 64/100. Verdict: Acceptable.
Hono scores 51/100. Evaluate modern alternatives for better security and AI-readiness.
Data sourced from NVD/NIST CVE database, GitHub API, and WebPulse framework scanner. Scores calculated using a 7-dimension model covering security, performance, ecosystem health, AI-readiness, developer experience, market trajectory, and cost of ownership. Updated June 2026.