Skip to content
Brief Security & Trust ·

Federal judge rules a Flock license plate search was unconstitutional

An Oklahoma judge said a deputy needed a warrant to search a woman's travel history in Flock's camera network.

In brief
  • An Oklahoma federal judge ruled a warrantless Flock search broke the Fourth Amendment. The evidence was thrown out.
  • The ruling is not binding precedent, and Flock says it expects an appeal.

404 Media reported that a federal judge in Oklahoma, Sara Hill, ruled on Thursday that a deputy broke the Fourth Amendment, which limits police searches. He had looked up a woman's license plate in Flock's camera network without a warrant. The judge found he did it only because the car had California plates. The woman, Melisa Kyle, is accused of meth trafficking. The lookup showed more than 50 records of her location over a month. He used that travel history to help justify searching her car, where 91 pounds of meth were found. Hill ordered that evidence thrown out.

The ruling is not binding precedent, 404 Media said, and other cases on warrantless plate searches are pending. Flock said it was not a party to the case. It expects an appeal and says the ruling covers only these facts. The sources do not say whether an appeal has been filed. They do not say how other courts will treat similar searches.

For people who build or buy tools that track vehicles, a federal judge has now written that searching one such network without a warrant can break the Constitution. The opinion is not binding, and Flock disputes its reach. It is still one court's reasoning on searches of large location databases.

A WebPulse Brief: a short report of an important event, written by the WebPulse Newsroom with AI assistance and checked against the reporting below. When there is more to explain, we follow up with a full story. How we use AI.

Reporting: 404 Media.